A vendor-neutral look at the firms that design, build, and install kitting and sequencing systems — assembling kits, sequencing line-side, and presenting the right parts just in time across many SKUs — the categories they fall into, how they compare, what a system costs, and how to choose.
Kitting and sequencing sit at the seam between the warehouse and the line — pulling the right parts, in the right order, and presenting them just in time to the operation that consumes them. A working system is not one machine: it takes picking (each or case), goods-to-person or goods-to-robot flow, mobile robots (AMRs) to move storage to the pick point, verification on every kit, and a software layer that orchestrates all of it against your WMS or MES.
A kitting and sequencing integrator is the firm that ties those pieces together and qualifies the whole system against your SKUs and takt time — anything from a single robotic kitting cell to a full distribution-center system. You typically need one (or a pre-engineered cell from one) if you are automating for the first time, run a high enough SKU count and kit variability that off-the-shelf won't fit, or lack an in-house automation team. As product variety climbs and SKU counts grow, doing this by hand becomes the bottleneck, and a wide field of integrators has grown up to automate it — from global goods-to-person houses to AMR-native newcomers.
The same spec sheet lets you compare any two integrators fairly.
How many SKUs, and how often the kit recipe changes. Fixed recipes reward classical, engineered cells; constant churn across many SKUs rewards adaptive, vision-guided systems that reconfigure in software rather than steel.
The rate the operation must sustain, and the peak it must hit. Throughput, storage density, and floor space usually decide between a fixed cell and a mobile fleet.
Conveyor, sortation, and AS/RS suit stable, high-volume flow; AMR or goods-to-person fleets suit operations that need to reroute and re-layout as demand shifts.
Each-pick versus case-pick changes the hardware, the software, and the achievable accuracy. Confirm the integrator's depth in your pick granularity and part types.
How the system integrates with your warehouse and manufacturing software to know what to pick, in what order, and where it goes. This decides how cleanly kits and sequences flow to the line.
Whether every kit is verified or sampled, and what happens when a pick goes wrong. Per-kit verification and a clear recovery path are where accuracy pays back or doesn't.
Most firms sit mainly in one category. Knowing which you need narrows the field fast.
| Category | Best for | Strengths | Trade-offs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Systems integrators (robotics + software) | Custom, software-integrated kitting systems | Tie robotics, goods-to-person, and their own software under one roof | Longer lead time; engineering cost on smaller jobs |
| Goods-to-person / AS-RS integrators | High-volume DC-scale kitting | Dense storage, high throughput, engineered reliability | Less flexible for constant SKU churn or small runs |
| Intralogistics / sortation integrators | Large sequencing and material-flow operations | Deep sortation and material-flow engineering; big-flow scale | Heavy for a single kitting cell; fixed layout |
| AMR goods-to-person | Flexible kitting that must re-layout | Mobile fleet reroutes without rebuilding conveyor | Throughput per robot; fleet scales with volume |
| Robotics-as-a-service | Lower-capex flexible kitting | Low up-front cost; flexible AMR picking as a service | Ongoing service cost; less bespoke engineering |
Table scrolls horizontally on small screens →
Listed alphabetically, not ranked — the right choice depends on your SKUs, not a leaderboard. Relling, the publisher of this guide, is included and marked as such.
| Integrator | HQ | Category | Known for | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bastian Solutions | Indianapolis, IN | Systems integrator | Robotics, goods-to-person, and its own software under one roof (Toyota Advanced Logistics) | Software-integrated custom kitting systems |
| Dematic | Atlanta, GA | Goods-to-person / AS-RS | Large-scale goods-to-person and AS/RS at DC scale (KION) | High-volume automated kitting at DC scale |
| Fives Group | Paris, FR | Intralogistics / sortation | Engineered sortation and material-flow systems | Engineered sortation-driven sequencing |
| Geek+ | Beijing, CN | AMR goods-to-person | Mobile-robot goods-to-person bringing shelves to the pick | Flexible AMR-based kitting |
| Honeywell Intelligrated | Mason, OH | Intralogistics / sortation | Conveyor, sortation, and robotics for order assembly | Engineered fulfillment and sequencing |
| inVia Robotics | Westlake Village, CA | Robotics-as-a-service | AMR goods-to-person picking offered as a service | Lower-capex flexible kitting via RaaS |
| KNAPP | Hart bei Graz, AT | Goods-to-person | Goods-to-person and pocket-sortation for precise sequencing | Precise sequencing and goods-to-person kitting |
| Relling | United States | AI-native / turnkey | AI-native robotic kitting cell; vision-adaptive, verified per kit, qualified off-site | High-mix kitting without re-tooling per kit |
| Swisslog | Buchs, CH | Goods-to-person / AS-RS | AutoStore and AS/RS robot-dense storage-to-kit flows (KUKA) | Robot-dense storage-to-kit systems |
| Vanderlande | Veghel, NL | Intralogistics / sortation | Large parcel, airport, and warehouse material-flow systems | Large logistics / parcel sequencing |
Table scrolls horizontally on small screens →
One from each of the categories most operations choose between today.
A global systems house whose large-scale goods-to-person and AS/RS installations feed kitting and sequencing at distribution-center scale. Part of KION, with the depth for high-volume, engineered automation where the flow is stable and throughput justifies the storage build-out. It is the low-risk baseline for DC-scale kitting; it is less suited to constant SKU churn or very small runs.
An intralogistics integrator with strong goods-to-person and pocket-sortation technology built for precise sequencing. A clear fit where the order of parts to the line matters as much as the pick itself, and where getting the sequence exactly right is the whole point. Choose it when sequencing precision, not just throughput, is the priority.
An AMR specialist whose goods-to-person systems support flexible kitting by bringing shelves and totes to the pick point. It is a strong fit where a mobile-robot fleet gives you the flexibility to reconfigure flows without rebuilding conveyor. As with any fleet-based approach, throughput scales with the number of robots, so size the fleet against your peak.
Relling builds an AI-native kitting cell for the high-mix, many-SKU work that fixed automation can't economically hold. Vision-guided picking assembles varied kits, so a new kit recipe is a software reconfiguration rather than a re-fixture and re-teach; every kit is verified per part rather than sampled; cells are scoped and qualified off-site and stand up on a US floor in weeks. It fits operations with high SKU counts and frequently changing recipes that want adaptive kitting without a months-long integration project. We include ourselves here for completeness and describe our cell on the same terms as the rest of the field.
| If your situation is… | Look at… | Why |
|---|---|---|
| High-volume DC kitting | Dematic or Honeywell Intelligrated | Engineered goods-to-person and fulfillment scale |
| Precise sequencing / goods-to-person | KNAPP or Swisslog | Built for sequence precision and dense storage-to-kit |
| Flexible AMR kitting | Geek+ or inVia Robotics | Mobile fleets reroute without rebuilding conveyor |
| Software-integrated custom system | Bastian Solutions | Robotics, goods-to-person, and software under one roof |
| Large logistics / sortation | Vanderlande or Fives Group | Depth in high-throughput sortation and material flow |
| High-mix robotic kitting cell | Relling | Vision-adaptive, per-kit verified, no re-tooling per kit |
We publish these guides because most manufacturers we meet are comparing exactly these categories. Relling is one option among the field above: a turnkey, vision-adaptive robotic kitting cell aimed at high-mix, many-SKU work, verified per kit, scoped and qualified off-site and running on your floor in weeks. If that matches your SKU profile, we're glad to be compared against anyone here on the same criteria — SKU variability, throughput, accuracy, deployment time, and service.
See how the Relling kitting workcell works →You can buy AMRs, goods-to-person modules, and warehouse software directly from vendors, but the parts do not add up to a working kitting or sequencing operation on their own. A systems integrator ties the picking hardware, goods-to-person or goods-to-robot flow, verification, and WMS/MES orchestration together and qualifies the whole system against your SKUs and takt time. First-time and high-mix buyers almost always work with an integrator or buy a pre-engineered cell; large operators with in-house automation teams sometimes integrate themselves.
As a rough industry guide, a single robotic kitting cell often runs about $100,000–$300,000 or more depending on SKU count, throughput, and verification requirements. Goods-to-person and AMR-based systems scale with the size of the fleet and storage, so a distribution-center deployment can run into the millions. Always price against your specific SKU count, kit variability, throughput target, and floor space.
Fixed automation — conveyor, sortation, and AS/RS — is engineered around a stable, high-volume flow and delivers high throughput once the layout is set. AMR goods-to-person systems bring shelves or totes to a pick point with a fleet of mobile robots, so the operation can reroute and re-layout as demand shifts without rebuilding conveyor. Stable high volume tends to favor fixed automation; changing SKUs and flexible flow tend to favor mobile fleets.
Well-designed kitting systems verify each kit rather than sampling, using vision, weight, or scan checks to confirm the right parts in the right quantities before the kit moves on. Accuracy depends on the picking method, the verification built in, and the error-recovery story when a pick goes wrong. Ask any integrator whether verification is per-kit or sampled, and how the system recovers from a mispick without stopping the line.
A pre-engineered robotic kitting cell can be running in a few weeks, especially when it is scoped and qualified off-site before shipping. A large goods-to-person or sortation system more often takes several months from order to production, driven by storage build-out, controls integration, and WMS/MES orchestration. Systems that are pre-built and qualified off-site shorten the time your own floor is tied up.
Match the integrator to your work: SKU count and kit variability, throughput target, whether you want fixed automation or a mobile fleet, the picking method, and how the system integrates with your WMS or MES. Ask for reference installations similar to your SKU profile, clarity on per-kit accuracy and error recovery, and a defined US service and response plan for downtime.
Editorial buyer's guide compiled by Relling for manufacturers evaluating robotic kitting and sequencing automation. Integrators are listed alphabetically and are not ranked; inclusion is not an endorsement and is not paid. Company details (headquarters, ownership, product lines) are drawn from public information and current as of publication — verify specifics, current pricing, and capabilities directly with each vendor. Relling is the publisher and is described on the same criteria as the other firms.
We started Relling to help American manufacturers make more of what this country needs. We'll scope projects to your needs and quote you so that your ROI typically closes within 18 months.