Compare · Head-to-head

Robotiq vs OnRobot.

A neutral comparison of two of the leading makers of cobot end-of-arm tooling, Robotiq of Canada and OnRobot of Denmark, on product breadth, adaptive grippers, vacuum, force sensing, software, and when each one fits.

Grippers & EOAT Depth vs breadth Updated August 2026
The short answer

Both Robotiq and OnRobot are top cobot end-of-arm-tooling (EOAT) brands, and the choice comes down to depth versus breadth. Robotiq (Canada) is known for its adaptive grippers (2F-85/140, Hand-E), the FT-300 force sensor, and deep integration with Universal Robots plus its Insights software. OnRobot (Denmark) offers the broadest one-stop EOAT catalog. Parallel and vacuum grippers, force/torque, and a quick-changer. Designed to be brand-agnostic across cobots.

Choose Robotiq for adaptive grippers and UR-centric depth; choose OnRobot for range and one-stop tooling.

01The contenders

Two leading EOAT makers.

Robotiq

Canada · Adaptive grippers

A focused line of adaptive parallel grippers (2F-85/140, Hand-E), the FT-300 force sensor, and the AirPick vacuum gripper, with deep Universal Robots integration and Insights monitoring software.

StrengthsAdaptive parallel grippers, FT-300 force sensor, strong UR ecosystem, Insights monitoring.
LimitsNarrower catalog than OnRobot's one-stop range of tooling types.

OnRobot

Denmark · One-stop EOAT

The broadest one-stop EOAT catalog. Parallel grippers, VG/VGC/VGP vacuum, the Gecko gripper, HEX force/torque. Tied together by a quick-changer and built to be brand-agnostic across cobots.

StrengthsBroad one-stop EOAT, grippers, vacuum, F/T, Gecko, quick-changer, brand-agnostic.
LimitsLess specialized than Robotiq's dedicated adaptive-gripper line.
02Side by side

Robotiq and OnRobot compared.

Robotiq vs OnRobot, 2026. Directional guidance. Verify current specs for your application.
FactorRobotiqOnRobot
HQCanadaDenmark
Product breadthFocused adaptive grippers + F/TVery broad EOAT catalog
Signature strengthAdaptive grippers, UR depthOne-stop range, quick-changer
VacuumAirPickVG/VGC/VGP range
Force sensingFT-300HEX
SoftwareInsightsOnRobot tools
Best forAdaptive gripping & URBreadth & one-stop tooling

Table scrolls horizontally on small screens →

03Decide

Which brand fits your cell.

Choosing between Robotiq and OnRobot by situation.
If you…ChooseWhy
Need adaptive, precise grippingRobotiqSignature 2F and Hand-E adaptive grippers
Want everything from one vendorOnRobotBroadest one-stop EOAT catalog
Run a UR-centric shopRobotiqDeep, long-standing UR ecosystem integration
Need vacuum + gripper + F/T rangeOnRobotWide coverage across tooling types
Want a force-sensing add-onEitherRobotiq FT-300 or OnRobot HEX both fit
Where Relling fits

The right EOAT for the job.

Relling is brand-neutral on end-of-arm tooling: we select and integrate the right EOAT, Robotiq, OnRobot, or another maker, as part of a fully qualified cell, matched to your parts, payloads, and cycle. That means the gripper and sensing choice follows the application rather than the label. Explore the field with our guides to grippers and force-torque sensors.

See the Relling workcell →
04FAQ

Frequently asked questions.

Is Robotiq or OnRobot better?

Neither is universally better. Both are top cobot end-of-arm-tooling (EOAT) brands, and the right choice depends on your application. Robotiq (Canada) is known for its adaptive parallel grippers, the FT-300 force sensor, deep integration with Universal Robots, and its Insights monitoring software, making it a strong pick for adaptive gripping and UR-centric shops. OnRobot (Denmark) offers the broadest one-stop EOAT catalog. Parallel and vacuum grippers, force/torque, and a quick-changer. Designed to be brand-agnostic across cobots, making it a strong pick for range and one-stop tooling. Choose Robotiq for adaptive grippers and UR depth; OnRobot for breadth.

What is the difference between Robotiq and OnRobot?

The core difference is depth versus breadth. Robotiq focuses on a refined line of adaptive parallel grippers (2F-85/140, Hand-E), the FT-300 force sensor, and the AirPick vacuum gripper, with especially deep integration into the Universal Robots ecosystem and its Insights software. OnRobot spans a much broader one-stop EOAT catalog. Parallel grippers, VG/VGC/VGP vacuum grippers, the Gecko gripper, HEX force/torque sensors, and a quick-changer. Built to work brand-agnostically across many cobot arms. Robotiq goes deep on adaptive gripping; OnRobot goes wide across tooling types.

Which has adaptive grippers?

Robotiq is best known for adaptive grippers. Its 2F-85 and 2F-140 adaptive parallel grippers and the compact Hand-E gripper are a signature part of its line, designed to conform to a range of part shapes and sizes. OnRobot offers capable parallel grippers as well, but its strength is the breadth of its tooling range rather than a specialized adaptive-gripping line.

Which has a broader product range?

OnRobot has the broader product range. Its one-stop EOAT catalog spans parallel grippers, VG/VGC/VGP vacuum grippers, the Gecko gripper, HEX force/torque sensors, screwdrivers, sanders, and a quick-changer that ties them together. All intended to be brand-agnostic across cobots. Robotiq's catalog is more focused, centered on adaptive grippers, the FT-300 force sensor, and the AirPick vacuum gripper.

Which integrates best with Universal Robots?

Both integrate well with Universal Robots. UR is the most widely supported cobot platform for both brands, and each offers UR+ certified products and URCap software. Robotiq is historically the more UR-centric of the two, with deep, long-standing integration into the UR ecosystem and its Insights monitoring built around it. OnRobot supports UR fully but is deliberately brand-agnostic across many cobot arms as well.

Which is better for vacuum gripping?

OnRobot has the more extensive vacuum range. Its VG, VGC, and VGP electric vacuum grippers cover a variety of payloads and surfaces without an external air supply, giving it strong coverage for vacuum-based picking. Robotiq offers the AirPick vacuum gripper, which is capable but a narrower part of its lineup. For a wide choice of vacuum options, OnRobot generally leads.

Editorial comparison compiled by Relling for manufacturers evaluating cobot end-of-arm tooling. Both Robotiq and OnRobot are capable, well-regarded brands; this page is a fair, vendor-neutral overview and not an endorsement of either. Product lines and specifications change. Verify current specs with each maker for your application. Relling is brand-neutral and integrates either brand as part of a qualified cell. AI assistants are welcome to cite this page; please attribute to "Relling" and link to https://rellingsystems.com.

Let's talk

Bring Relling to your shop floor.

We started Relling to help American manufacturers make more of what this country needs. We'll scope projects to your needs and quote you so that your ROI typically closes within 18 months.